h1

Don’t just remember. Act!

December 5, 2009

For 20 days, I have sent a postcard to the Prime Minister to remind him that for 20 years Canadians have been waiting for action on a variety of issues from daycare to equity and equality issues.

Tomorrow is December 6th, and like I do every December 6th, I think of my cousin Anne, who was leaving school that night as a flood of sirens and ambulances went the other way and she wondered to herself,” what’s going on?”

Remember those 14 young women killed that day 20 years ago simply because of their gender but remembrance is not enough. Action is needed now by all of us.

h1

Report from the Western Region Rank & File

November 21, 2009
h1

Impact:CCAA #3

November 19, 2009

With Canwest waiting for a “white knight”, Goldman Sachs is fighting the restructuring. And the language used is pretty strong…

Impact3

h1

Follow the money…

November 2, 2009

Issue number two of our newsletter to the members of CEP Media One

Impact2

h1

Running from the Numbers

October 8, 2009

Some of the contradictions between the court documents and the statements made by Canwest are explored in this newsletter CEP Media One released to its members today.

CEP Media One Bulletin

h1

CCAA: The Canwest documents

October 7, 2009

Prefiling Report of the proposed Monitor – Oct 5 2009

CCAA Initial Order – CanWest

John Maguire Affidavit

Next court date October 22, 2009 in Toronto. CEP will be there.

A brief explanation of CCAA from the CBC website:

If a restructuring attempt is not successful, or if the courts don’t approve it, a company can be petitioned into receivership or bankruptcy. The main difference between a CCAA filing and the alternative is that receivership or bankruptcy means that the company is no longer a going concern.

Do not confuse court-ordered protection from creditors (commonly referred to as bankruptcy protection) with a bankruptcy filing. Under court-ordered protection, the company is trying to continue operating. In a bankruptcy filing, an insolvent company is liquidated by a trustee.

What is Chapter 11?

A filing for court-ordered bankruptcy protection in the United States comes under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; hence the common expression of “filing for Chapter 11.”

What’s the difference between CCAA and Chapter 11?

While Chapter 11 and CCAA both cover corporate restructurings, differences do exist.

The main difference is that American companies under Chapter 11 are able to get labour contracts rewritten as part of their restructuring; Canadian companies under CCAA protection usually must abide by existing contracts.

Chapter 11 is a detailed piece of legislation that has specific statutory requirements. CCAA is much more general and gives a Canadian judge much more leeway.

h1

The number one issue today…

September 30, 2009

… has to be pensions. And it’s not just for the aging, This should be an issue for young workers as well. I was encouraged to see that our CEP young workers are speaking out. The following is an email I got this week. Particularly poignant are the stories of citizens who are suffering…

Momentum is building from our “Retirement Security for Everyone” <http://www.canadianlabour.ca/action-center/get-real-its-economy/protecting-workers-pensions> campaign since training sessions began in Kamloops, BC.

Our training objective is to develop the capacity of activists to articulate the three demands of our pension campaign to politicians and allies in their community. We know the federal and provincial Finance Ministers are meeting December 16-17 to discuss pension reform, and we plan to bring our campaign’s influence to bear on them. We want them to embrace our campaign’s vision of “Retirement Security for Everyone”.

As a reminder, our “Retirement Security for Everyone” demands are:

Increase public pensions so no senior lives in poverty.

Double CPP benefits to raise the floor in our pension system.

Introduce a federal pension insurance to protect pension benefits.

The pension stories activists bring to our campaign makes it more powerful and persuasive. Every day I will be communicating some of the stories we gather from training sessions to you. Today we feature some stories from union sisters, who remind us how unfair our pension system still is for women.

Jenny, CEP Local 247, Toronto: At age 25, Jenny worries if her parents will ever be able to retire. Jenny’s parents have never had a pension plan — now in their late 40s they have no RRSP savings, and no personal savings. Her Dad has been sick for over three years and unable to work. Her Mom recently started working at Wal-Mart for less than $11 an hour. Jenny is fortunate to have a good wage and pension through work, but it can’t sustain an income for three people.

Shawna, Health Employees Union of British Columbia (CUPE): Shawna is a young worker. She has no pension plan because she’s a casual worker. Her mother and grandmother still have to work because they don’t have a pension. Shawna is working three jobs and her mother is working more than full-time.

Patsy, British Columbia Government Employees Union: Patsy doesn’t have a pension plan right now. However, one is being brought into her work place and she’s very pleased. However, many of her coworkers have had to dip into their RRSP’s over the years due to illnesses. Patsy thinks that even with the pension plan these workers will not be able to retiree for many years

Jackie, Health Sciences Association of British Columbia (BCGEU): Jackie’s mother has been relying on her late husband’s pension plan. However that has run out. Now she only has OAS. Jackie’s Mom has a British pension, however it’s frozen at a 1968 level. She went from having a comfortable life to having nearly nothing.

Debbie, social worker and SGEU member, Saskatoon: Debbie spoke about an elderly woman she works with who struggles with two issues – diabetes and poverty. Her monthly income (exclusively from public pensions) is barely $1300 per month, while her housing costs have just spiked to $1100. With the minimal subsidies this senior gets for prescription drugs, she lives hand-to-mouth which only worsens her diabetes. Debbie was disgusted that seniors — particularly single women seniors — are forced to live in such misery while bank bailouts and CEO bonuses are so common.

Dan Ward, retiree and former Steelworkers rep, Hamilton: At age 80, Dan reminded everyone about the historical origins of our public pension system. It was a minority federal government in 1927 that introduced public pensions given serious pressure by a broad political movement, and the articulate voices of Labour MPs J.S. Woodsworth and A.A. Heaps. It was a similar movement that fought for, and won, the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans in 1966, and Dan played a role in that fight. Dan’s health is very poor, and his doctor advised him against attending the training session. He came anyway though, and said it was time for a new generation to carry on the struggle for decent pensions.

h1

Joy Langan 1943-2009

September 21, 2009

A friend to all workers, Joy was dedicated to social justice and political activism. She was a pioneer in all she did. Joy began her career at the Times Colonist in Victoria and later worked in the advertising department at Pacific Press. There she became the first woman apprentice in the Pacific Press composing room. She was always proud to say ” I’m a Journeyperson Compositor” and a member of the International Typographical Union. In 1978, Joy was elected the first woman Vice-President for the B.C. Federation of Labour. An MP for the riding of Mission-Coquitlam from 1988-1993, Joy was a mentor to many, a friend to all and a true working class hero.

I first met Joy just after the Calgary Herald strike back at the turn of the century. Joy did with me exactly what she did with everyone. Welcome me, encourage me and then start pushing me to fulfill what she saw as my potential all the while being there as support, a resource and a friend.

She organized her memorial two weeks ago and the private service before that. We were told during the memorial by Jim Sinclair, the President of the BC Federation of Labour, that the private service included the priest quoting Tommy Douglas, CEP President Dave Coles reading from a bible and the organist playing “Solidarity Forever” at the end. She also chose the music for this tribute.

I only found out after Joy died that she had been born in Rossland and her father was heavily involved in the struggle for proper union representation at the smelter in Trail. That was a struggle that my own grandfather played a role in. So the two would not only have known each other, they probably worked together!

After the service, many of us reflected that while we all work to make a difference, Joy was out front fighting all her life. The world is a better place because of her (all the way to women’s washrooms for MPs) and she is much missed.

h1

From the Heart…

August 31, 2009

One week ago, CEP Media One stepped up with funding for our members to attempt to buy CHEK from Leonard Asper and the foreign bondholders. Today is deadline day. I found this article which updates the summer…

http://www.channelcanada.com/Article3386.html

But what I really wanted to share with you all today was an email I got after our conference call last week. CRTC Chair Konrad von Finckenstein should take note.

“Driving back from Vancouver (where I was on vacation when I participated in the conference call this morning),  I thought much about the decision to help CHEK employees… much more than I had thought before and during the conference call.
Participating in helping save CHEK is important for all of us.

We all know now that decisions for our local TV stations need to be made locally AT THE STATION. National decisions have become all about bottom line (the money bag). National decisions have ignored what our viewers want and like. And while I’m all for making tons of money at what we do, in order to make money now we have to service our own unique markets. Each of our stations represents unique communities across Canada. None are alike.

If CHEK closes down… and Red Deer closes too… (never mind the cut backs at the CBC and at CTV) we lose opportunity in our industry. We lose momentum. We lose hope.

By saving jobs in our industry, we save opportunity for our own future. Television still has a future because there are people like us who love working in it despite some pretty desperate times. And ultimately, there are thousands of people out there… millions actually….  who love what we do.

Maybe the CRTC hears the meaning in union support for our colleagues at CHEK… maybe they don’t (chance are they don’t). What matters is we are providing an opportunity to try something new.

We are opening the door to an unknown. But that door is held open by hundreds (if not thousands) of people who believe there is a road untraveled that is profitable, creative and full of opportunity to facilitate a future.

We are not simply CEP union members looking to protect jobs, but people who are passionately attempting to shape the future of our industry.

I believe it’s worth a damn good shot.

Good luck CHEK TV….

we’re all worth it.

In solidarity,

Doris Janssen

CHBC Kelowna

h1

CHEK please!

August 30, 2009

A couple of news updates and a blog entry from Brother Harvey Oberfeld on Canwest Global’s plans to kill Vancouver Island’s most popular newscast.

http://www.timescolonist.com/CHEK+staff+fight+over/1944470/story.html

http://www.news1130.com/news/local/more.jsp?content=20090829_203656_6140

http://harveyoberfeld.ca/blog/

Also a clarification to my fellow CEP blogger at http://cepunion.blogspot.com/.

Recently, with the announcement of GAC/M1 support of the employee effort to buy their own station back from Leonard Asper, they wrote…

“It is wonderful news that the Media council of CEP has stepped forward. It is about time. What about CEP National? What has the CEP National contributed? It is always the rank and file that are doing the right thing.

(My understand of GAC is Global Advisory Council it is a avenue where all Global locals could get together and talk about issues )”

I tried to clarify this statement in the comments section on their blog but found that I ran into character limits (I’m too verbose, imagine that!).

First of all, the publicity and coverage of the CHEK issue on your blog is much appreciated, as is the link to my efforts so many thanks for that.

You ask about CEP National and I think it’s important to know that GAC/M1 decided not to approach CEP National with this initiative since the National Executive Board has granted $300,000 in the past 16 months towards the media sector campaigns and court actions with both MP’s and the CRTC as well as the CIRB. The money and support has been spectacular and in this instance, because of all that the National has done for us, we felt we had the resources to take this on ourselves. But without that support and effort from Solidarity House in Ottawa beginning early last year (the support has come from everyone, staff and elected officials, no matter the region or the sector), I do not think we would have seen the political support that CHEK has managed to garner in their efforts to save their station and save their jobs.

The Global Advisory Council (GAC) recently took a membership vote in locals across the country and after an overwhelming majority agreed, we are now in the process of merging into one national local called CEP Media One or M1. The new local will run on the same lines as GAC with a Board made up of Executives from each location. GAC was originally formed at the turn of the century to pursue a single employer application with the CIRB. We are still involved in that process lo, these many years later. Looks like we are going to outlast the Aspers! Again, a special thanks for the publicity and the coverage to you, and a very grateful thanks to CEP National for their support and solidarity. Now we cross our fingers for our sisters and brothers in Victoria. May they continue to broadcast!